QUOTE
Actually, you are wrong on some counts, and even when you aren't completly wrong, you fail to notice the security lapses in IE. Yes, Firefox may have malicious extensions, but have you ever heard of things like Smiley Central, My Web Search, etc? All of these toolbars that people install without knowing also perform malicious activity. I wouldn't want a toolbar tracking what websites I go to, just so it can target pop up ads to what I have been viewing. You seem to forget that stuff like that is just as malicious as 'rouge' Firefox extensions (which I have never encountered in my three years of Firefox use). Oh, and you are prompted to install Firefox extensions, they don't just magically get added to your system.
Personally, Firefox has a good way in plugins. There are many more usefull plugins in firefox. But there are two things which you err on:
-Plugins both in IE and FF can only be installed after the user accepts them ALWAYS. Some plugins in IE can be installed after a downloaded package. You know like Adobe's software asking you to install google toolbar. This happens a lot in IE but hasn't much of a foothold in FF.
-I've been developing plugins for both browsers, and can say that FF plugins leave more control to the programmer rather the IE which has a limiting sandbox (consider how easily plugins for firefox can be done rather then in IE) of course in this case, more control=more dangerous.
QUOTE
Secondly, if you are going to fret about memory, then go ahead. Just don't fret over 6MB, okay? You see, most people today have at least 512MB, and a few here and there don't make that much of a difference. Have you ever done tests to see how fast tabs open in each browser?
With 2Gb of RAM here, I can't complain in fact I don't. But people don't get things right. Some people claimed the firefox can be run on a 16Mb 500Mhz system. By far, only IE6 could ever do that.
As to tabs, with automatic switching I find them faster in IE7 then FF3.
What really pisses me off is startup speed, which you forget to comment about

.
QUOTE
Firefox will most likely conquer over IE. Finally, I would like to see the list of protocols (the exclusion of FTP, as you will read below, please) that IE supports over Firefox. Yes, I know you are going to say FTP. But do you actively use the FTP feature in IE? Have you ever noticed how folders randomly get dropped out of the upload process? Do you despise the lack of information given by the IE FTP interface? Exactly. Yes, it may have FTP, but it is just as poor as the FTP extension for Firefox.
By far, I prefer IE's ftp, but rather then FTP it has a support for a wide range of components especially available for intranet control. I found them very easy to work with. FF doesn't support anything similar, not even with plugins.
I'm not sure about that. Can't say IE is good, but my point here ain't who's conquering who, but rather who's forcing who. Whenever I install a new XP OS the first I do is updating. And guess with what? IE, because firefox ain't there. I simply prefer having IE preinstalled then having to play around with Firefox. For me, firefox is a good development aid. I've been in website design for a couple of years now. I've been actually working in this industry, and the good people I've met with doesn't fret about these sort of things.
QUOTE
If you use FTP even occasionally, you need to download a full fledged FTP client like FileZilla.
For widespread use, I use that

. But in emergencies, I use a Dos prompt or IE. Some people term that as a life saver; it is

.