
dangerous dave... always stripping down and critiquing people's posts sentence by sentence, instead of as a whole

The time for which country? And why not just block the program access to the internet, thereby it will always use the system time, therefore it's no more secure.
It wouldn't matter if the time it checks is accurate to your actual time... what matters is that it can be compared to the time it first checks it.
for example... you might live in china, but it doesn't matter where you live, because no matter where you are, it would record in one single time zone. Lets say you open the program for the first time, and it checks the date as "1/3/2011" for example, but in your time it is actually 2/3/2011, it wouldn't matter anyway.
Every time you open the program, it would quickly check the date shown online which would remain in the same time zone constantly, and compare it to the origional date checked.
once the date reaches 30 days different from the original date check, it would deny access to the program.
store the original date check as a registry entry, or somewhere it wouldn't be found easily.
p.s. most people wouldn't get as far as figuring out that the program uses internet to check the time, whereas more people are likely to try simply changing the date on their computer.
lots of software programs use internet access to check weather the program is genuine or not, but most people don't think to block the program's access to the internet to prevent this process.
If you can make a failsafe version, why would you not use this failsafe as the actual version so you don't have to be connected to the internet 24/7?
Most people are connected to the internet 24/7, so it wouldn't be a problem in most situations. The failsafe version is easily tricked, by simply changing the system time..., the internet version wouldn't be tricked as easily.
So it would make sense to make the program TRY the more secure method first, then if it fails, revert to the crappy system time check method.
A statement on the kind of people you make friends with rather than a statistically significant survey.
And I'd say your hypocritical words are just as much based on your quick to judge assumtptions.
My statement was in fact based on a Statistically significant survey:
http://abs.gov.au/au....nsf/mf/8153.0/Which clearly shows, that there are far less than 10% of people in Australia still using Dial up services as apposed to any other type of internet service.
Apparently, it's pretty easy to find this information on the internet. I mean, it's posted above...
What are the chances that a random person downloading your game off softpedia for example, just happen to know HOW your game was made, and just happen to know that the author of the program posted his methods of making a time trial for the program on this website?
Chances are slim to none...
The simple fact is, many software distributers use methods of security that use the internet to check for activation codes, or whatever it might be, and in most cases it works... yes, some people might play around, and try to hack it, and eventually figure out that it uses internet access to check the keys, but most people don't bother trying that much. thus ending up with a secure program, and a happy customer still.
More people are likely to think "hmm I wonder if I simply changed the date on my computer..." *click click*
Australia is in the top 25% of fastest average internet speeds in the world.
I'm curious to know what "statistically significant survey" you pulled those facts from...

I will admit, I used bad wording here... Its not one of the worst in the world with internet technology, compared to every single country in the world,
but among all of the main countries around the world, it is right down the bottom end, if you look at the "statistics"...
For example:
http://www.jamaipane...nternet-speeds/when there are countries that don't even have widespread access to electricity

uuuh, well those people won't be "downloading" any programs to their imaginary computer's will they? Soooo HOW is this relevant?

Clearly I would be talking about people who would have a computer, and internet access of some sort.
Edited by pure_evil020, 07 February 2011 - 07:56 AM.