Jump to content


Photo

Dragon Age 2


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 disturbed317

disturbed317

    GMC Member

  • GMC Member
  • 557 posts

Posted 12 August 2010 - 02:42 AM

I don't know how popular Dragon Age: Origins was, but in my opinion it was an amazing game. I've easily put more hours into that game than any one person should. At first news, I was overly excited about the upcoming sequel, purchased a gamer magazine just for an article on it... But I was thoroughly disappointed when I read that the game, unlike the previous, would not be allowing the player's to create their character. Instead you play as Hawke, a male warrior.

To me, the character creation and origins in the first game was the deal sealer. But now I'm warily looking forward to the sequel's release, unsure if I'll want to shell out the 60$ for it. I've already been greatly disappointed by Final Fantasy XIII (though looking forward to Versus XIII) and don't want to go through that again.

What does the rest of the community think?
  • 0

#2 thatshelby

thatshelby

    GMC Member

  • GMC Member
  • 3823 posts
  • Version:GM8

Posted 12 August 2010 - 03:15 AM

I haven't played that game, however, I love character customization.

For instance, being able to at least create a character that is used for, say, after the main story, is still fun, but I like to create the main character.

Bottom line: Creating your own character just helps me get into the game more... like Oblivion, that was a good example.
  • 0

#3 sub

sub

    EVIL GENIUS

  • GMC Member
  • 1852 posts
  • Version:GM6

Posted 12 August 2010 - 05:04 AM

usually games improve and expand features when they release sequels.

going from custom chars to preset chars is a step back, it indicates everything else in the game will be preset also. (there'll be less optional content)

the FF series became disappointing.. ditto fallout 3..

read a few reviews before you shell out $60..
  • 0

#4 True Valhalla

True Valhalla

    ಠ_ಠ

  • Retired Staff
  • 4880 posts
  • Version:GM:Studio

Posted 12 August 2010 - 05:20 AM

One character? With a *choose your offensive word of choice* name? Yuck.

DA:O was great. I'm not a graphics whore, but give me DA:O with a purty graphics engine and I'll gladly hand over another $100, but playing as warrior "Hawke" sounds awful. I hope your sources are incorrect.

-Tv
  • 0

#5 disturbed317

disturbed317

    GMC Member

  • GMC Member
  • 557 posts

Posted 12 August 2010 - 09:01 PM

One character? With a *choose your offensive word of choice* name? Yuck.

DA:O was great. I'm not a graphics whore, but give me DA:O with a purty graphics engine and I'll gladly hand over another $100, but playing as warrior "Hawke" sounds awful. I hope your sources are incorrect.

-Tv


Well, this article seems to clarify some misconceptions (I blame on the magazine I bought): Joystiq Article

The game will feature a character creation, just not as in-depth... it sounds like it'll allow choice of gender and customizable appearance, though.
  • 0

#6 D4rkSh4d0w

D4rkSh4d0w

    GMC Member

  • New Member
  • 39 posts

Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:44 PM

It's not that bad actually. Played Mass Effect? :) It will be similar. + we get a voice, yay! :D
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users