it offers graphics.
it has games and current projects by 6 * gaming.
it is kinda plain right now, it will get better.
so, what do you think.
Edited by kindu, 25 March 2008 - 12:28 AM.
6 Star Gaming Productions
Started by kindu, Mar 23 2008 03:41 AM
13 replies to this topic
#1
kindu
-
- New Member
-
- 378 posts
GMC Member
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:41 AM
here is the new website from 6 star gaming:6 STAR GAMING
it offers graphics.
it has games and current projects by 6 * gaming.
it is kinda plain right now, it will get better.
so, what do you think.
it offers graphics.
it has games and current projects by 6 * gaming.
it is kinda plain right now, it will get better.
so, what do you think.
#2
gm_nerd
-
- New Member
-
- 281 posts
GMC Member
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:05 AM
Ok you need to get a new site hoster. Bravehost not good.
try
http://www.gigacities.net
http://www.hostmonster.com
http://www.snakehost.com
try
http://www.gigacities.net
http://www.hostmonster.com
http://www.snakehost.com
#3
ibinisback
-
- New Member
-
- 0 posts
GMC Member
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:44 PM
ya bravehost isnt good...to many ads slow service stuff like that...
#4
kindu
-
- New Member
-
- 378 posts
GMC Member
Posted 25 March 2008 - 12:29 AM
alright thank u both.
I have changed the Host.
So what do u think of the site.
I have changed the Host.
So what do u think of the site.
#5
kai3114
-
- New Member
-
- 70 posts
GMC Member
Posted 28 March 2008 - 05:43 AM
the site is too simple.... need to spend more time on design, too few content that all i want to say and good luck....
#6
KC LC
-
- Retired Staff
-
- 5309 posts
Ex-Administrator
Posted 01 April 2008 - 09:26 PM
Yes, the design is very simple. But it's functional. Some people like minimalism. 
I'd suggest adding more description to your game page. You have a title and screenie. Users might also like a short summary and a few words about the game play.
I'd suggest adding more description to your game page. You have a title and screenie. Users might also like a short summary and a few words about the game play.
#7
kindu
-
- New Member
-
- 378 posts
GMC Member
Posted 02 April 2008 - 02:00 AM
thanks for the feedback.
yes i wana keep it simple, this way i can focus on the content.
i will add a description to the games.
This website will mostly offer graphics. I might add tutorials for drawing and examples for gameplay.
*Added description.
*New rips.
yes i wana keep it simple, this way i can focus on the content.
i will add a description to the games.
This website will mostly offer graphics. I might add tutorials for drawing and examples for gameplay.
*Added description.
*New rips.
#8
theweirdn8
-
- GMC Member
-
- 3835 posts
Unrivaled Legend
- Version:GM8.1
Posted 02 April 2008 - 03:43 AM
btw, you should not post graphics rips to your site.
#9
kindu
-
- New Member
-
- 378 posts
GMC Member
Posted 03 April 2008 - 01:13 AM
y not, i ripped them all by myself.
is it becuase there are other riped sprite websites?
I just wanna add more content to the website.
what do you suggest to see on the website.
is it becuase there are other riped sprite websites?
I just wanna add more content to the website.
what do you suggest to see on the website.
#10
Dinsdale
-
- New Member
-
- 1389 posts
GMC Member
Posted 03 April 2008 - 08:42 PM
I can't really suggest much. Just some nice css / layout and maybe make the "stars" a bit more eye pleasing.
#11
kindu
-
- New Member
-
- 378 posts
GMC Member
Posted 03 April 2008 - 10:14 PM
theyre not stars, just ink blots. but maybe they should be stars.
#12
10to2
-
- New Member
-
- 75 posts
GMC Member
Posted 04 April 2008 - 05:53 AM
I tend to agree with KC LC above. Content aside, there's a simple basic approach to this I really kind of like.
I would, however, lose the serif font, Times New Roman. Most pages on the web use sans-serif fonts like Arial or Helvetica. They read much better on screen. Serif fonts are better for printed media.
You have the character "|" between your links - is that intentional? It looks like an error. Also, stick with upper or lower case for your link text. Having five isn't really enough to introduce a pattern as you do, and it just looks sloppy.
Which 'justification' are you going with, centred or left? You have both on various pages which throws the visitors' eyes all over the place when they navigate. Pick one. Stick with it.
You have a definite theme going on here, so well done. Most people miss that. You just need to implement it a little better, justification, common font sizes etc.
All in all, I would say that this design has definite promise. But remember, it's all for nothing without (relevant) content.
Will look forward to updates.
TtT
I would, however, lose the serif font, Times New Roman. Most pages on the web use sans-serif fonts like Arial or Helvetica. They read much better on screen. Serif fonts are better for printed media.
You have the character "|" between your links - is that intentional? It looks like an error. Also, stick with upper or lower case for your link text. Having five isn't really enough to introduce a pattern as you do, and it just looks sloppy.
Which 'justification' are you going with, centred or left? You have both on various pages which throws the visitors' eyes all over the place when they navigate. Pick one. Stick with it.
You have a definite theme going on here, so well done. Most people miss that. You just need to implement it a little better, justification, common font sizes etc.
All in all, I would say that this design has definite promise. But remember, it's all for nothing without (relevant) content.
Will look forward to updates.
TtT
#13
kindu
-
- New Member
-
- 378 posts
GMC Member
Posted 05 April 2008 - 03:32 AM
alright here are some improvements.
the font is arial
no more "|" in between links.
all uppercase lettering.
all justifacation is centered.
thanx for advice. is there anything else that needs to be changed, or improved before i start adding more content.
the font is arial
no more "|" in between links.
all uppercase lettering.
all justifacation is centered.
thanx for advice. is there anything else that needs to be changed, or improved before i start adding more content.
#14
10to2
-
- New Member
-
- 75 posts
GMC Member
Posted 09 April 2008 - 08:16 AM
There's definitely a rough scraggy approach to this website that I really like. It's kind of so awful, it works!
To be honest, I could go on for ages about tweaks you could incorporate here and there. But it's your website and your design. I don't want to say use Arial for the main text if Times is what you're after, or get rid of the <hr />(s) if that's the effect you want. It's your website. I don't want to sway you from what you had in mind.
However, on a mechanical note.....
If that's your code behind the website, you need some DOC TYPE and <HTML><HEAD><TITLE> and <BODY> tags in there to make it more browser and search engine friendly. The W3C will tell you why. Also, give some dimensions to your graphics width="700", height="100" etc, and change the ALT tags that ImageShack have imposed (if possible).
Good luck, Sir.
TtT
To be honest, I could go on for ages about tweaks you could incorporate here and there. But it's your website and your design. I don't want to say use Arial for the main text if Times is what you're after, or get rid of the <hr />(s) if that's the effect you want. It's your website. I don't want to sway you from what you had in mind.
However, on a mechanical note.....
If that's your code behind the website, you need some DOC TYPE and <HTML><HEAD><TITLE> and <BODY> tags in there to make it more browser and search engine friendly. The W3C will tell you why. Also, give some dimensions to your graphics width="700", height="100" etc, and change the ALT tags that ImageShack have imposed (if possible).
Good luck, Sir.
TtT
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
