Edited by KC LC, 06 June 2007 - 12:10 AM.
Forum Plea
#1
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:38 PM
#2
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:41 PM
#3
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:41 PM
Considering the fact that GM is made for 2d games, and Mark Overmars said he didn't really want to develop the 3d in GM, I don't think seperating the 2d and 3d games is a good choice. Most members like the 2d games more than the 3d, and there almost no 3d games in the creations board, so why make a seperate board for them?think the admins should consider this to be added as I know me and some other members of the forum would like to see them seperate as we aren't really interested that much in 2D GM games.
-- TC
#4
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:42 PM
#5
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:43 PM
Pros: It may encourage members to make 3D games.
Cons: These are likely to be bad quality.
As long as you put 3D somewhere in the title, I think that there's enough distinction there already.
#7
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:48 PM
#8
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:50 PM
That discussion wasn't about 3d and 2d, but about fangames and originals. Anyway, there should be no seperation in boards. It's not necessary (not yet, we don't got too many games in one board yet)We had a huge discussion about the exact same suggesstion last week. Why dont you read through that topic instead? Btw, you'll find the answer is No!
Link
They aren't the same? The only thing in which 3d games are different than 2d games is the fact that 3d games are 3d and 2d games are uhhh... well..., 2d.you understand this is like a primar seperation between games in GM? that's why I would like them to be seperated, they aren't in the same rang
Edited by TCGamer, 05 June 2007 - 03:52 PM.
#9
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:51 PM
#10
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:52 PM
That discussion wasn't about 3d and 2d, but about fangames and originals. Anyway, there should be no seperation in boards. It's not necessary (not yet, we don't got too many games in one board yet)We had a huge discussion about the exact same suggesstion last week. Why dont you read through that topic instead? Btw, you'll find the answer is No!
Link
It was about separation in general. Read the topic.
Besides, 90% of those who makes 3D games, announce that its a 3D game in the topic description. So whats the problem?
Edited by TheMordeus, 05 June 2007 - 03:53 PM.
#11
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:55 PM
#12
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:56 PM
I've read the whole topic, I found it an interesting discussion, but unless I mistake the words fangames and originals for 2d and 3d, the topic was mostly about fangames and originals.It was about separation in general. Read the topic.
Just put 3d in your topic's title, like TheMordeus suggested.of course, that is true.. but then I would suggest a 3D Games forum instead of a seperation of the GMC one..
Edited by TCGamer, 05 June 2007 - 03:57 PM.
#13
Posted 05 June 2007 - 03:56 PM
yes, I was aware it had a discussion about that.. if nothing else, could we at least get a post icon saying "3D" to see it clearly.. it's kinda distracting between all those plain games.. and a GM7 smiley?It was about separation in general. Read the topic.
Besides, 90% of those who makes 3D games, announce that its a 3D game in the topic description. So whats the problem?
okay, since that's all, you can kinda close this topic, since it's useless
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked







